I have to express my concern over this photo of La Lohan. The entire thing reminds me of those Calvin Klein ads from the late-90s that were kiddie-porn-esque. This wanton bikini pic has the same vibe. The straggly hair only ads to the image's disturbing nature. Could she look more rough? Add the sparkly sandals and Lindsay is screaming little girl playing dress-up in a most disconcerting way. I mean, seriously, WHAT? was she thinking. And finally, the very fact that this picture exists is kind of freaky. Supposedly taken at Jeremy Piven's Malibu beach party (we will skip the problem that is a barely 20-something at a 40-year-old's b-day bash) how does a random pose like this get snapped and sent online? Who was waiting for Lohan to come out of that room? Why did she decide to pose for it? And who EVER decided that a flesh-toned swimsuit was a good idea?
Thursday, July 27, 2006
Little Lohan Lost
I have to express my concern over this photo of La Lohan. The entire thing reminds me of those Calvin Klein ads from the late-90s that were kiddie-porn-esque. This wanton bikini pic has the same vibe. The straggly hair only ads to the image's disturbing nature. Could she look more rough? Add the sparkly sandals and Lindsay is screaming little girl playing dress-up in a most disconcerting way. I mean, seriously, WHAT? was she thinking. And finally, the very fact that this picture exists is kind of freaky. Supposedly taken at Jeremy Piven's Malibu beach party (we will skip the problem that is a barely 20-something at a 40-year-old's b-day bash) how does a random pose like this get snapped and sent online? Who was waiting for Lohan to come out of that room? Why did she decide to pose for it? And who EVER decided that a flesh-toned swimsuit was a good idea?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
Hideous. Flesh-toned swimsuit? Ugh. I am in total agreement with you here.
Post a Comment